raspberrysweettea: (hammer)
raspberrysweettea ([personal profile] raspberrysweettea) wrote2025-01-13 09:40 am

(no subject)

A new Neil Gaiman article just dropped. I wouldn't recommend reading it if you're not in a good headspace, because it gives explicit details of some of the incidents.

Edit: the article is long.

Edit 2: I posted this before finishing the article because I'm a slow reader. "explicit details" is too kind of a description. Some of this stuff is absolutely horrific.


shadowbliss: (Default)

[personal profile] shadowbliss 2025-01-13 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah...I'm thinking of throwing out some of his books after reading that...
shadowbliss: (Default)

[personal profile] shadowbliss 2025-01-13 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I still have books of his in my collection (including the final Sandman omnibus) that I simply haven't read. I'm going to at least TRY to read them and if I can't, donate them. I'd LIKE to put on "who cares about who the artist is if the art moves you?" hat (and if I were working in a library, I'd take that road because they're not paying anything to the author directly) but...things are more complicated in today's world

I also think it's weird that he is one of three writers credited with revitalizing comics to being "serious art" - the other two being Frank Miller and Alan Moore. I kind of can't believe Moore is actually the one who comes out of that trinity the most unscathed by controversy (Miller is a rather outspoken bigot).
matsushima: you try and show me shallow pools but I've seen oceans (black skies)

[personal profile] matsushima 2025-01-14 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
If your books are still in good condition, a library might accept them as a donation. He's such a famous author that they'll likely still be purchasing his books to fill patron requests - it's considered the ethical thing. (See: this article.) At least they wouldn't be giving him and more money?